Terrorism risk for charity funds downgraded by Treasury report from medium-high to low

This year’s National Risk Assessment of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing says little use of charity funds to finance terrorist activity has happened

The risk of charities being used to fund terrorism has been downgraded from medium-high to low, according to a risk assessment carried out by the Treasury and the Home Office.

The National Risk Assessment of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing 2017, published yesterday afternoon, says comparatively little terrorist financing is known to have happened given the size of the charity sector. It praises the Charity Commission’s work in this area.

But it warns that some charities, particularly those working abroad, are still vulnerable to this kind of abuse, and says the problem could intensify if banks continue to withdraw services from charities that operate in high-risk areas.

The last National Risk Assessment was published in 2015 and estimated the risk of terrorist financing using charities to be medium-high.

But the latest report deems the risk to be low, saying: “While the risks in the sector are unchanged, government and law enforcement agencies have conducted significant work since 2015 to increase understanding of the sector and the risks that it faces around terrorist financing.

“In comparison to the overall size of the UK charity sector, the amount of known abuse for terrorist financing is very low.”

The document says it is unlikely any charities had been set up specifically to finance terrorism.

But it warns that the 13,000 to 16,000 UK charities that operate internationally face “significantly higher risks”, particularly those operating in areas such as Syria and Iraq.

The 30 per cent of these charities with annual incomes of less than £10,000 are especially vulnerable to abuse because they are less likely to be receiving professional advice and could make honest mistakes or adopt poor practices that put them at risk, the report says.

Where charities have been linked to financing terrorism, the report says, “a significant proportion” have been legitimate charities that have fallen victim to internal abuse by employees, volunteers or trustees, or they have been looted in the country in which they operate.

Latest headlines

A number of aid organisations have had their bank accounts frozen or closed by banks in recent years because of concerns about operating in high-risk areas.

The report acknowledges this and warns: “If this trend persists, de-risking may have the effect of pushing charities out of more intensely regulated areas of activity and into higher risk ways of working, such as transacting through physical cash or unregulated money service businesses, thereby increasing the risks in the sector.”

In the UK, the charities most likely to be at risk are those operating in London, the Midlands and north-west England, according to the report.

The report says the Charity Commission’s outreach programme focusing on charities identified as high-risk has been effective and, with the commission’s guidance and regulatory alerts, was likely to have contributed to reducing the risk of abuse from within charities.

Michelle Russell, director of investigations, monitoring and enforcement at the commission, welcomed the report.

In a statement, she said: “It is essential that those charities that are at greater risk take steps to protect themselves so that charitable funds are not abused.

“Any trace of terrorist financing within the sector corrodes public confidence in charities and cannot be tolerated. One case is one too many, which is why we continue to work proactively with the subsection of the sector that remains at high risk.”

She urged charities to review the compliance resources available in the commission’s website and to ensured they had strong financial, due-diligence and monitoring controls in place to prevent terrorist exploitation.

Source link

Armed forces and emergency services charities invited to apply for Libor fine funds

The Treasury has not announced how much money is available and it is likely this will not be known until applications have been assessed

– This article was corrected on 22 June 2017; please see final paragraph

Armed forces and emergency services charities have been invited to apply for grants from the latest round of Libor fine funding.

The government has been giving selected charities and good causes funds raised from banks that were fined for illegally fixing the inter-bank lending rate, or Libor, in 2012.

In the latest round of funding, which opened to applications today, charities and community interest companies can apply for grants for projects that will support serving or former members of the armed forces or the emergency services and their families.

The Treasury, which is managing the fund, has not announced how much funding is available and the exact amount is not expected to be finalised until all the applications have been assessed.

The government has given out more than £700m in Libor fine funding since 2012.

There is no upper funding limit for applications and guidance put out by the Treasury says some projects might be funded in part if full funding is not possible. 

Organisations can bid alone or in partnership, with one partner deemed to be the lead organisation.

The Treasury said its assessment criteria included the difference each project would make to the armed forces and emergency services communities, the value for money it offered and how sustainable it was.

Applicants that ask for funding for a capital project would have to have match-funding of at least 50 per cent, the Treasury said.

The department said some projects would not be funded in this round, including those that focused on the delivery of emergency services, those focused primarily on heritage and conservation activities or those where the primary beneficiaries were members of the public.

The closing date for applications, which must be submitted online, is noon on 25 August. Final decisions will be made in November.

For more information and to apply, click here.

– The story originally said projects would be funded either in full or not at all.

Source link